The amount of compensatory sweating depends on the patient, the damage that the white rami communicans incurs, and the amount of cell body reorganization in the spinal cord after surgery.
Other potential complications include inadequate resection of the ganglia, gustatory sweating, pneumothorax, cardiac dysfunction, post-operative pain, and finally Horner’s syndrome secondary to resection of the stellate ganglion.
www.ubcmj.com/pdf/ubcmj_2_1_2010_24-29.pdf

After severing the cervical sympathetic trunk, the cells of the cervical sympathetic ganglion undergo transneuronic degeneration
After severing the sympathetic trunk, the cells of its origin undergo complete disintegration within a year.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1967.tb00255.x/abstract

Spinal cord infarction occurring during thoraco-lumbar sympathectomy
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1963;26:418-421 doi:10.1136/jnnp.26.5.418

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Sympathectomy increased the pain threshold and made the sympathectomized rats hypesthetic

Normal adult rats were sympathectomized at L2-L3. The threshold for thermal noxious pain by hot-plate analgesia test and changes in neuropeptides in the lumbar dura mater and dorsal root ganglia using light microscopic immunohistochemistry were assessed and compared with control rats.
Results: In the hot-plate analgesia test, sympathectomized rats increased their hot-plate latency time compared with that of sham-operated rats. Density of calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactive fibers in sympathectomy side of the lumbar dura mater decreased to 45.5% compared with the contralateral side. The number and size of calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactive cells in dorsal root ganglia showed no difference between sympathectomized and contralateral side.
Conclusion: Sympathectomy increased the pain threshold and made the sympathectomized rats hypesthetic. A large numbers of sensory fibers innervated the lumbar dura mater via L2-L3 sympathetic nerve in rats. Sympathectomy reduced the number of these nerve fibers in the lumbar dura mater. Sympathetic nerves may play an important role for low back pain involving the lumbar dura mater.
http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Abstract/1996/04150/An_Anatomic_Study_of_Neuropeptide.4.aspx

Long-term sympathectomy induces sensory and parasympathetic fibres sprouting, and mast cell activation in the rat dura mater

http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1330488/

There are similarities between the delayed onset of the human pain state and the delayed rise in sensory peptides after sympathectomy

The effect of sympathectomy on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) level in the rat primary trigeminal sensory neurone was investigated. Six weeks after bilateral removal of the superior cervical ganglion there was a 70% rise in the CGRP content of the iris and the pial arteries, a 34% rise in the concentration in the trigeminal ganglion but no change in the brainstem. The CGRP rise in both end organs suggests that this phenomenon may be common to all peripheral organs receiving combined sensory and sympathetic innervations. The lack of any rise in the brainstem CGRP content raises the possibility that this process spares central terminations. In contrast, the level of neuropeptide Y, a peptide mainly contained in sympathetic terminals, fell to 35% of control values in the iris and pial arteries whilst the trigeminal ganglion and brainstem concentrations remained unchanged. The possible relevance of these observations to the clinical syndrome of postsympathectomy pain (sympathalgia) is discussed. There are similarities between the delayed onset of the human pain state and the delayed rise in sensory peptides after sympathectomy.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3877546

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

huge percentages of people who give their informed consent to treatment do not really understand what they have chosen

Informed consent is one of the foundations of bioethical discourse. Bureaucrats have forced doctors and researchers to fill out endless forms in the belief that informed consent will enhance patients’ autonomy.
However, questions are being asked about whether this business of informed consent is really working. In an early online article in the Journal of Medical Ethics, Neil Levy, the Australian editor of another journal, Neuroethics, argues that bioethicists need to rethink informed consent.
Why? Because the lesson of all of modern psychology and of post-modern philosophy is that our rationality is terribly flawed. We are blind to the future consequences of our actions; we are not objective in assessing claims that touch us personally;  we overestimate the effects of setbacks on our well-being; we are unreliable in estimating how bad or how good events made us feel. In short, human reasoning is subject to many fallibilities. it seems utterly naïve to think that Yes always means Yes and No always means No. So Levy declares that doctors need to return to paternalism, to some extent:
“patient autonomy is best promoted by constraining the informed consent procedure. By limiting the degree of freedom patients have to choose, the good that informed consent is supposed to protect can be promoted…


Somewhat surprisingly, Arthur Caplan, of the University of Pennsylvania, probably the best-known bioethicist in the US, agrees with Levy. In a companion article, he says:
“autonomy is fundamentally inadequate in healthcare settings and requires supplementation by experience-based paternalism on the part of doctors and healthcare providers…
“A large number of studies have shown that huge percentages of people who give their informed consent to treatment or to their involvement in research do not really understand what they have chosen. Autonomy lives with hope and hope, in the form of the therapeutic misconception, often trumps autonomy.”
Questioning informed consent shakes a pillar of modern bioethics and the call for more benevolent paternalism is sure to face stiff opposition.
http://www.bioedge.org/index.php/bioethics/bioethics_article/9979#comments

Monday, April 23, 2012

Digital infrared thermal image after T2 sympathicotomy or T3 ramicotomy

(A) Clear cut change of skin temperature after a T2 sympathicotomy. (B) An even distribution of skin temperature after ramicotomy.
Gossot and colleagues [8] analyzed a group of T2, T3, T4 sympathectomy patients in comparison with a group of patients undergoing a T2, T3, T4 ramicotomy and they reported no statistical difference regarding the incidence of CS between the two groups studied (72.2% and 70.9%). However in terms of the severity of CS (embarrassing, disabling) causing inconveniences to daily life, they reported 27% and 13% incidences in these two groups, respectively. These findings suggest that by preserving the sympathetic trunk, it was possible to reduce the severity of CS.
The preganglionic fibers of the sympathetic nerve to the arm originate mostly from the spinal segments T3–T6 and the postganglionic fibers of the sympathetic nerve to the arm originate from T2 and, to a lesser extent, the T3 ganglia [9]. This implies that the division of preganglionic fibers (rami communicantes) reduces the extent of denervation of the sympathetic nerve as compared with the division of postganglionic fibers (sympathetic trunk) in the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.
Sympathectomy or sympathicotomy is one of the procedures used to divide the sympathetic trunk. Sympathicotomy distinctively changes sympathetic nerve distribution in comparison with a ramicotomy. Figure 4A illustrates the clear-cut changes of skin temperature after a T2 sympathicotomy. However the overall sympathetic nerve distribution to the body is not markedly changed after a T3 ramicotomy because a T3 ramicotomy is a procedure that is used to divide one of the preganglionic fibers and to preserve the sympathetic trunk. Figure 4B illustrates an even distribution of skin temperature after T3 ramicotomy.
 http://ats.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/78/3/1052#FIG4

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Drionic effectively "...reduced sweating for up to 6 weeks..."

Clinical Studies

The following comments are from clinical studies which demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of Drionic:
  1. Efficacy of the Drionic unit in the treatment of hyperhidrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;16:828-832. "...the Drionic unit appears to have a definite place in the treatment of hyperhidrosis." Daniel L. Akins, M.D. John L. Meisenheimer, M.D. Richard L. Dobson, M.D., Professor & Chairman, Dept. of Dermatology From the Department of Dermatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
  2. A new device in the treatment of hyperhidrosis by iontophoresis. Cutis 1982;29:82-89. Drionic effectively "...reduced sweating for up to 6 weeks..." Further, the study concluded that "Because of its design, it has great potential for home use." CPT John L. Peterson, M.D. MAJ Sandra I. Read, M.D. COL Orlando G. Rodman, M.D. Chief, Dermatology Service From the Dermatology Service, Dept. of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
  3. Tap water iontophoresis in the treatment of hyperhidrosis. Int J Dermatol 26;1987:194-197. "Tap water iontophoresis is a recognized method of reducing sweat in various parts of the body. The Drionic device is a battery-operated method of inducing tap water iontophoresis. This simple device may be used at home and is effective in reducing hyperhidrosis for as long as 6 weeks." Mervyn L. Elgart, M.D., Professor & Chairman, Dept. of Dermatology Glenn Fuchs, M.D. From the Department of Dermatology, George Washington Univ. Medical Center, Washington, DC.
  4. Efficacy of the Drionic unit in the treatment of hyperhidrosis. JAm Acad Dermatol 16:828-832, Apr. 1987. Elgart ML, Fuchs G: Tap water iontophoresis in the treatment of hyperhidrosis. Int J Dermatol 26: 194-197, Apr. 1987. (old model)